DeLalio v. Wyoming, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1224 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
DeLalio v. Wyoming, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1224 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Patrick Davis (ca4, 2011-09-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Patrick Davis
4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davis v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3340 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1224 (2010).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Baucom
4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Baucom, 360 Fed.Appx. 457 (4th Cir.) (“Baucom II”), c ert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3340 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1224 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Isom
7th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Mays, 593 F.3d 603, 608 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3340 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1235 (2010); United States v. Hankton, 432 F.3d 779, 791 (7th Cir.2005); United States v. Thomas, 280 F.3d 1149, 1154 (7th Cir.2002); United States v. Galbraith, 200 F.3d 1006, 1013 (7th Cir.2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bradley
7th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
Sentencing judges necessarily have “discretion to draw conclusions about the testimony given and evidence introduced at sentencing,” but “due process requires that sentencing determinations be based on reliable evidence, not speculation or unfounded allegations.” United States v. England, 555 F.3d 616, 622 (7th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 346 , 178 L.Ed.2d 147 (2010); see United States v. Mays, 593 F.3d 603, 608 (7th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3340 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1235 (2010); Pulley, 601 F.3d at 665 ; United States v. Rollins, 544 F.3d 820, 838 (7t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George DeLalio
v.
Wyoming
No. 09-1266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 1224
Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 626.