green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.4 score
“statement unwittingly made to a confidential informant and recorded by the government is not 'testimonial' for confrontation clause purposes”
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Patel
statement unwittingly made to a confidential informant and recorded by the government is not 'testimonial' for confrontation clause purposes
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dunn
(2×)
See [State v.] Ellmaker, 289 Kan. [1132,] 1151, [ 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 560 U.S. 966 (2010)].
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dunn
See [State v.] Ellmaker, 289 Kan. [1132,] 1151, [ 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 560 U.S. 966 (2010)].
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gleason
See State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1138-39 , 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 560 U.S. 966 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dominguez
In those circumstances this court has held the clearly erroneous standard of review applies. 298 Kan. at 644-46; see State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1139 , 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), cert. denied 560 U.S. 966 (2010); see also Tapia, 295 Kan. at 995 (clearly erroneous standard of review applied on appeal to defendant’s juiy instruction issue when defendant’s request for jury instruction before district court was interpreted as being so indistinct as to not clearly communicate the request or, alternatively, as being different from the request being made on appeal).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Hagaman
The People, in turn, impeached the mother’s credibility by cross-examining her regarding her prior statement to Shea that defendant had handled the camera while they were at the unit. 2 There may well be circumstances where impeachment evidence would remain material and exculpatory — and thereby warrant disclosure — even if the People attempted “to avoid [its] disclosure ... by not calling the relevant witness to testify” themselves (United States v Jackson, 345 F3d 59, 71 [2d Cir 2003], certs denied 540 US 1157 [2004], 541 US 956 *1186 [2004]; compare United States v Williams-Davis,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Jordy v. State
See, e.g., Williams v. State, 301 S.W.3d 675, 687 (Tex.Crim.App.2009) (assuming evidence inadmissible under rule 404(b), and holding no abuse of discretion because appellant opened the door), cert. denied, 560 U.S. 966 , 130.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jean Leonard Harris
v.
Sandra Wittman
v.
Sandra Wittman
No. 09-1249.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2010.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 590 F.3d 730.