green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.2 score
“due diligence means the petitioner 'must show some good reason why he or she was unable to discover the facts' at an earlier date.”
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Capers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
due diligence means the petitioner 'must show some good reason why he or she was unable to discover the facts' at an earlier date.
cited
Cited "see"
Mehdipour v. Whitten
See 10th Cir. R. 32.1(A). 5 (same), vacated on other grounds, Melson v. Allen, 561 U.S. 1001 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See Melson v. Allen, 548 F.3d 993, 998 (11th Cir. 2008), cert. granted, judgment vacated on other grounds, 561 U.S. 1001 (2010) (a federal habeas petitioner “may not attempt to resurrect a terminated statute of limitations by subsequently filing documents that purport to ‘relate back’ to previously submitted documents that were, in themselves, insufficient to toll the statute.”) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Parker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See Melson v. Allen, 548 F.3d 993, 998 (11th Cir. 2008), cert. granted, judgment vacated on other grounds, 561 U.S. 1001 (2010).!
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wesley Foote
(2×)
See Simmons v. United States, 561 U.S. 1001 , 130 S.Ct. 3455 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1048 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Beckford
See Matter of L-G-, 21 I. & N. Dec. 89 , 95-96 (BIA 1995), modified by Matter of Yanez-Garda, 23 I. & N. Dec. 390 (BIA 2002); see also Fernandez v. Mukasey, 544 F.3d 862, 874 (7th Cir.2008) (adopting this approach), judgment vacated by Fernandez v. Holder, 561 U.S. 1001 , 130 S.Ct. 3451 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1049 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
v.
Brandy Wilson
v.
Brandy Wilson
No. 08-1335.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 2010.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: M.D. Florida (1)
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 177 L. Ed. 2d 91 (2010).