green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Santiago v. O'BRIEN
See Clements v. Clarke, 592 F.3d 45, 55-56 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3475 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1070 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stote v. Roden
“The presumption of correctness is equally applicable when a state appellate court, as opposed to a state trial court, makes the finding of fact.” Teti v. Bender, 507 F.3d 50, 58 (1st Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 1719 (2008) (internal quotation and citation omitted); see also Clements v. Clarke, 592 F.3d 45, 47 (1st Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 561 U.S. 1014 (2010) (“Any state court factual findings are presumed to be correct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barry Northcross Patterson
v.
Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
v.
Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
No. 09-10313.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 1070
Published
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 46.