green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“because was domiciled in texas and this case was removed to the southern district 17 of texas, under rule 17(b) the capacity to sue is determined by texas law.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robinson v. Ashland Inc.
because was domiciled in texas and this case was removed to the southern district 17 of texas, under rule 17(b) the capacity to sue is determined by texas law.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dyal v. Jeffcoat
Fourth, Officer Cardigan or other prison staff opened the doors in the F dormitory to improve ventilation in response to inmates’ complaints about the odor.14 Officer Cardigan is liable for deliberate indifference only “if ‘he knew of ways to reduce the harm but knowingly declined to act’ or if ‘he knew of ways 14 It is also worth noting that “[t]he [repainting] of the facility clearly had a legitimate objective not related to punishment.” Joseph v. Foti, 37 F.3d 632, *3 (5th Cir. 1994) (Unpublished).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calloway v. Pinkney
See Grant v. Thomas, 37 F.3d 632 (5th Cir. 1994), citing Collins v. King, 743 F.2d 248, 253-54 (5th Cir. 1984) (“[T]here is no due process violation if a prisoner, who is falsely accused of charges, is given an adequate state procedural remedy to challenge the accusations”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. American Petrofina Pipeline Co.
(2×)
See United States v. American Petrofina Pipeline Co., 37 F.3d 632 (5th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. City of Galveston, Tex.
See, e.g., Idoux v. Lamar University System, 828 F.Supp. 1252 (E.D.Tex.1993) (Kent, J.), aff'd. in part, 37 F.3d 632 (5th Cir.1994); Strother v. Columbia-Brazoria Ind. School District, 839 F.Supp. 459 (S.D.Tex.1993) (Kent, J.), aff'd., 32 F.3d 565 (5th Cir.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hudson
v.
Ruleville Police Dept.
v.
Ruleville Police Dept.
94-60320.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 23, 1994.