United States v. Sec. Indus. Bank, 456 U.S. 922 (1982). · Go Syfert
United States v. Sec. Indus. Bank, 456 U.S. 922 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Chavez v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs (ca9, 1992-04-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Chavez v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Providence Journal Co., 485 U.S. 693, 703-04 , 108 S.Ct. 1502, 1508-09 , 99 L.Ed.2d 785 (1988) (separation of powers principles require that the Supreme Court be able to review lower court decisions notwithstanding the views of the executive branch) (explaining Bob Jones University v. United States, 456 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1965 , 72 L.Ed.2d 437 (1982) (order appointing amicus curiae in support of judgment)); cf. Young v. U.S. ex rel.
discussed Cited "see" Prudencio Chavez v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs United States Department of Labor Todd Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Todd Shipyards Corporation Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Prudencio P. Chavez
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Providence Journal Co., 485 U.S. 693, 703-04 , 108 S.Ct. 1502, 1508-09 , 99 L.Ed.2d 785 (1988) (separation of powers principles require that the Supreme Court be able to review lower court decisions notwithstanding the views of the executive branch) (explaining Bob Jones University v. United States, 456 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1965 , 72 L.Ed.2d 437 (1982) (order appointing amicus curiae in support of judgment)); cf. Young v. U.S. ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES
v.
SECURITY INDUSTRIAL BANK
No. 81-184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1982.
456 U.S. 922
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

[*1966] April 19, 1982. The motion of appellee Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc. to schedule oral argument during April, 1982 session is denied.