green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Walsh
(2×)
Amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union argues for the application of "heightened scrutiny" to § 566.090.1(3), based on a "test" essentially similar to the inquiry undertaken by the Supreme Court in City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 32 9, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States
See RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440 , 1446 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Stoller v. Ford Motor Co.
See RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440 , 1444-45 & n. 5, 221 U.S.P.Q. 385 , 388-89 & n. 5 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
See RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440 , 221 USPQ 385 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
See RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440 , 221 USPQ 385 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 468 U.S. 1228 , 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984). 59 There being substantial evidence capable of supporting the jury's finding of no anticipation, and thus a failure of Safety to prove anticipation, the granting of Safety's motion for JNOV on anticipation by The Wheelchair Book must be reversed. 60 (iii) Obviousness 61 The jury concluded (question Nos. 27-29) that Safety had failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the inventions set forth in claims 5 and 6 would have…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Higgs v. DIST. COURT IN AND FOR DOUGLAS CO.
Sullivan, 396 U.S. at 240 , 90 S.Ct. at 406 . "[A]bsent an award so excessive or inadequate *861 as to shock the judicial conscience and to raise an irresistible inference that passion, prejudice, corruption or other improper cause invaded the trial, the jury's determination of the fact is considered inviolate." Hurd v. American Hoist and Derrick Co., 734 F.2d 495, 503 (10th Cir.1984), (quoting Barnes v. Smith, 305 F.2d 226 , 228 (10th Cir.1962)); see also Blevins v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 728 F.2d 1576 (10th Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984); Whitele…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Higgs v. District Court In & For the County of Douglas
Sullivan, 396 U.S. at 240 , 90 S.Ct. at 406 . “[AJbsent an award so excessive or inade quate as to shock the judicial conscience and to raise an irresistible inference that passion, prejudice, corruption or other improper cause invaded the trial, the jury’s determination of the fact is considered inviolate.” Hurd v. American Hoist and Derrick Co., 734 F.2d 495, 503 (10th Cir.1984), (quoting Barnes v. Smith, 305 F.2d 226 , 228 (10th Cir.1962)); see also Blevins v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 728 F.2d 1576 (10th Cir.1984), cert, dismissed, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984); Whitele…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Witt v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Et Al.
See, e.g., Knighton v. Maggio, 468 U.S. 1229 , 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting); Woodard v. Hutchins, supra, 464 U.S., at 382 , 104 S.Ct., at 755 (BRENNAN, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyreese Rowan v. Norman G. Owens, Superintendent, Indiana State Reformatory, Pendleton, Indiana
(2×)
See, e.g., Keeten v. Garrison, 742 F.2d 129, 134 (4th Cir.1984); Smith v. Balkcom, 660 F.2d 573, 578-79 (5th Cir.1981), modified on other grounds, 671 F.2d 858 (1982); see also Knighton v. Maggio, 740 F.2d 1344, 1351 (5th Cir.), stay denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 32 , 82 L.Ed.2d 923 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HAZELTINE CORPORATION
v.
RCA CORPORATION
v.
RCA CORPORATION
No. 84-8.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 29, 1984.
105 S. Ct. 32
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed pursuant to Rule 53 of this Court.