Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force, 37 F.3d 1495 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force, 37 F.3d 1495 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles T. Sherwin
v.
United States Air Force, an and Ronald G. Sprovero Ronald L. Billmyer A.D. Talley B.R. Henderson Celia Smith Laverne Harper M.R. Peters Robert Cutrell Robert Stroebel Donald Robinson Jeff Osborne Brad Adams William Waller R.S. Burrus
92-1678.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 11, 1994.
37 F.3d 1495
Published

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant Appellee, AN and
Ronald G. SPROVERO; Ronald L. Billmyer; A.D. Talley; B.R.
Henderson; Celia Smith; Laverne Harper; M.R. Peters;
Robert Cutrell; Robert Stroebel; Donald Robinson; Jeff
Osborne; Brad Adams; William Waller; R.S. Burrus, Defendants.

No. 92-1678.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted September 20, 1993.
Decided October 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR)

Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles T. Sherwin appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his complaint alleging a violation of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552a (West 1977 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States Air Force, No. CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED