green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“the question of defendant's capacity is within the trial judge's discretion and his determination thereof, if supported by the evidence, is conclusive on appeal.”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Whittington
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the question of defendant's capacity is within the trial judge's discretion and his determination thereof, if supported by the evidence, is conclusive on appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coley
See State v. Reid, 38 N.C.App. 547, 549-50 , 248 S.E.2d 390, 392 (1978) ("The fact that two to three months prior [to the competency hearing] the defendant was determined to be mentally capable to proceed to trial cannot be determinative in itself when the examining psychiatrist casts doubt on his own testimony" by stating on cross-examination that he could not express an opinion regarding the defendant's competency on the date of the hearing.), disc. review denied, 296 N.C. 588 , 254 S.E.2d 31 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ager
See State v. Reid, 38 N.C.App. 547, 550 , 248 S.E.2d 390, 392 (1978) (holding that the trial court's finding of competency could not be upheld since the examining psychiatrist's conclusion that the defendant's schizophrenia was in remission and he was therefore competent to stand trial was nullified by testimony at trial that the psychiatrist had not seen the defendant some two or three months thereafter, and could not state an opinion whether defendant was still competent at the time of trial), disc. review denied, 296 N.C. 588 , 254 S.E.2d 31 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WOODELL
v.
PETERS
v.
PETERS
No. 169 P.C..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 5, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1979.