Clark v. Am. & Efird Mills, 323 S.E.2d 920 (N.C. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Clark v. Am. & Efird Mills, 323 S.E.2d 920 (N.C. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ETHEL K. CLARK, Employee
v.
AMERICAN AND EFIRD MILLS, Employer, and AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Carrier
No. 167A84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 8, 1985.
323 S.E.2d 920
Charles R. Hassell, Jr. for plaintiff-appellee. , Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner, Feerick & Kincheloe, by Hatcher Kincheloe and John F. Morris for defendant-appellants.
Consideration, Vaughn.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The Industrial Commission is to determine on remand whether claimant has an occupational disease and whether claimant is disabled as a result thereof in light of the factors enumerated in this Court’s opinion in Rutledge v. Tultex Corporation, 308 N.C. 85, 301 S.E. 2d 359 (1983).

Affirmed.

Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.