Ward v. Durham Life Ins., 371 S.E.2d 284 (N.C. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Ward v. Durham Life Ins., 371 S.E.2d 284 (N.C. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 · …to be within the scope of employment, an employee, at the time of the incident, must be acting in furtherance of the principal's business and for the purpose of accomplishing the duties of his employment. ⚠ not in text
27 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Medlin v. Bass (nc, 1990-12-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Medlin v. Bass (2×)
N.C. · 1990 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
to be within the scope of employment, an employee, at the time of the incident, must be acting in furtherance of the principal's business and for the purpose of accomplishing the duties of his employment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WARD
v.
DURHAM LIFE INS. CO.
No. 309A88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 28, 1988.
371 S.E.2d 284
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (2)

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to additional issues allowed 28 July 1988.