green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.8 score
“this court is not unmindful that circumstantial evidence is often the only evidence available to show retaliation against protected activity. nevertheless, the causal connection must be something more than speculation . . . .”
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Salter v. E & J HEALTHCARE, INC.
this court is not unmindful that circumstantial evidence is often the only evidence available to show retaliation against protected activity. nevertheless, the causal connection must be something more than speculation . . . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medlin v. Bass
Thus, where the employee's action is not expressly authorized or subsequently ratified, an employer is liable only if the act is "committed within the scope of ... and in furtherance of [the employer's] business." Id. (emphasis added); see also Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 93 N.C.App. 431, 437 , 378 S.E.2d 232, 235 , disc. rev. allowed, 325 N.C. 270 , 384 S.E.2d 513 , cert. granted, 325 N.C. 704 , 387 S.E.2d 55 (1989), disc. rev. improvidently allowed, 326 N.C. 356 , 388 S.E.2d 769 (1990); Troxler v. Charter Mandala Center, 89 N.C.App. 268, 271 , 365 S.E.2d 665, 668 , disc. rev. denie…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BLANCHFIELD
v.
SODEN
v.
SODEN
No. 391P89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 7, 1989.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)
Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 December 1989.