Thomason v. Longley, 407 S.E.2d 852 (N.C. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Thomason v. Longley, 407 S.E.2d 852 (N.C. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the legislature is presumed to have intended a purpose for each sentence and word in a particular statute, and a statute is not to be construed in a way which makes any portion of it ineffective or redundant.”
10 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Porter v. Leneave (ncctapp, 1995-07-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Porter v. Leneave
N.C. Ct. App. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the legislature is presumed to have intended a purpose for each sentence and word in a particular statute, and a statute is not to be construed in a way which makes any portion of it ineffective or redundant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THOMASON
v.
LONGLEY
No. 157P91.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 12, 1991.
407 S.E.2d 852
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 June 1991.