neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.5 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
AMY JANE SISK
v.
AMY JANE SISK
No. 371A96.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 11, 1997.
Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by J. Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
,
Paul M. James, III, for defendant-appellant.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Johnson. We hold that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.