green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Saenz v. Kijakazi
See Loza, 219 F.3d, at 393 ; Lovelace, 813 F.2d at 59 ; Hernandez v. Shalala, 41 F.3d 665 , 1994 WL 685062, at *3 (Sth Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (unpublished) (concluding that the plaintiff's headaches were controlled through treatment and medication, and thus did not affect her RFC).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Acosta v. Astrue
Johnson v. Bowen, 864 F.2d 340, 348 (5th Cir.1988) (per curiam); Hernandez v. Shalala, 41 F.3d 665 , 1994 WL 685062, at *3 (5th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (unpublished) (concluding “Hernandez’s ... diabetes, obesity, high cholesterol, and headaehes[ ] were controlled through treatment, diet, and medication, and thus did not affect her RFC” and holding substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s finding that Hernandez had the RFC for sedentary work); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1530 (a).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hernandez
v.
Shalala
v.
Shalala
94-50135.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 25, 1994.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Hernandez
v.
Shalala*
NO. 94-50135
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov 25, 1994
Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. A-92-CA-512
1
AFFIRMED.