State v. Gobal, 661 S.E.2d 732 (N.C. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Gobal, 661 S.E.2d 732 (N.C. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“statements elicited by a defendant on cross- examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law.”
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Hester (ncctapp, 2017-07-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Hester (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
statements elicited by a defendant on cross- examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Buchanan
N.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gobal , 186 N.C.App. 308 , 320-21, 651 S.E.2d 279 , 287 (2007), aff'd per curiam , 362 N.C. 342 , 661 S.E.2d 732 (2008). 2 In Gobal , the defendant argued that he should not have been sentenced for two separate crimes where his two acts constituted one offense.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
AUDREY GOBAL
No. 545A07.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 12, 2008.
661 S.E.2d 732
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. , Brian Michael Aus for defendant-appellant.
Cited by 33 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.