Kuhn v. Interstate Motor Freight Sys., 509 N.E.2d 943 (Ohio 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Kuhn v. Interstate Motor Freight Sys., 509 N.E.2d 943 (Ohio 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kuhn
v.
Interstate Motor Freight System Ins. Co. of N. America, Surety, Appellee Mayfield, Admr.
No. 86-587.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jul 1, 1987.
509 N.E.2d 943
John R. Polofka, for appellant Gary Kuhn., Bugbee & Conkle, Gregory B. Denny and Robert L. Solt III, for appellee., Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Charles E. Bloom and Michael L. Squillace, for appellant Mayfield, Admr.
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright.
Published

Lead Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. L-85-212 is hereby af[*160] firmed on authority of Holben v. Interstate Motor Freight System (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 152, 31 OBR 318, 509 N.E. 2d 938, decided this date.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Dissent

Locher, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Holben v. Interstate Motor Freight System (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 152, 31 OBR 318, 509 N.E. 2d 938.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.