Depew v. Ogella, 635 N.E.2d 310 (Ohio 1994). · Go Syfert
Depew v. Ogella, 635 N.E.2d 310 (Ohio 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Smith v. Honda
Ohio Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
Co., 69 Ohio St.3d 611 , 613–14, 635 N.E.2d 310, 313 (1994), citing Ragone v. -4- Case No. 8-23-17 Vitali & Beltrami, Jr., Inc., 42 Ohio St.2d 161 , 327 N.E.2d 645 (1975) paragraph one of the syllabus.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clinton Physical Therapy Services, P.c. Vs. John Deere Health Care, Inc. And John Deere Health Plan, Inc., F/k/a Heritage National Health Plan, Inc.
Iowa · 2006 · confidence medium
Ry., 635 N.E.2d 310, 313 (Ohio 1994) (“The purpose of an interrogatory is to ‘test the jury’s thinking in resolving an 12 ultimate issue so as not to conflict with its verdict.’ ” (Citation omitted.)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clinton Physical Therapy Services, P.C. v. John Deere Health Care, Inc.
Iowa · 2006 · confidence medium
Ry., 69 Ohio St.3d 611 , 635 N.E.2d 310, 313 (1994) (“The purpose of an interrogatory is to ‘test the jury’s thinking in resolving an ultimate issue so as not to conflict with its verdict.’ ” (Citation omitted.)).
discussed Cited "see" Moretz v. Muakkassa (2×)
Ohio · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" CSAHA/UHHS-Canton, Inc. v. Aultman Health Found.
Ohio Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Freeman v. Norfolk & Western Ry., 69 Ohio St.3d 611, 613 , 635 N.E.2d 310 (1994).
cited Cited "see" York v. Mayfield Neurological Institute, Inc.
Ohio Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Freeman, 69 Ohio St.3d at 614 , 635 N.E.2d at 313-314 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Depew
v.
Ogella
No. 94-742.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jul 27, 1994.
635 N.E.2d 310
Layboume, Smith, Gore & Goldsmith, A. Russell Smith, Robert B. Layboume and Joy S. Wagner, for appellants., Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs Co., L.P.A., and David W. Hilkert, for appellee.
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

The motion to certify the record is allowed, the judgment on appeal is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504.

AM. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents.

Concurrence

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.