Victor Eugene Vick v. Doctor Mark W. Tidewater Reg'l Jail, Med. Section, 46 F.3d 1129 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Victor Eugene Vick v. Doctor Mark W. Tidewater Reg'l Jail, Med. Section, 46 F.3d 1129 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
48 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Griffin v. State of West Virginia (wvsd, 2017-12-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Griffin v. State of West Virginia
S.D.W. Va · 2017 · confidence medium
Ward, 46 F.3d at 1129.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Plymail v. Mirandy (3×) also: Cited "see"
S.D.W. Va · 2017 · confidence medium
For example, “[s]tate remedies may be rendered ineffective by inordinate delay or inaction in state proceedings.” Ward v. Freeman, 46 F.3d 1129 at *1 (4th Cir. 1995) (unpublished table decision).
cited Cited "see" Norris v. Williams
D.S.C. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ward v. Freeman, 46 F.3d 1129 at *1 (4th Cir. 1995) (unpublished table decision) (“State remedies may be rendered ineffective by inordinate delay or inaction in state proceedings.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. MacK
E.D. Pa. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Warf, 46 F.3d 1129 (table), 1995 WL 50155 (4th Cir.1995) (defendant had adequate notice and opportunity to challenge where he received the PSR eight days before sentencing); United States v. Gibson, 64 F.3d 617, 626 (11th Cir.1995) (notice on day of sentencing did not violate Due Process because pre-trial discovery from the government had included copies of all his prior convictions, defense lawyer filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence of prior crimes that indicated his familiarity with his client’s record, and defense lawyer contacted the probation officer …
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Eisenhardt
D. Maryland · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 46 F.3d 1129 , 1995 WL 10223 (4th Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Victor Eugene Vick
v.
Doctor Mark Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Medical Section
94-7073.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 18, 1995.
46 F.3d 1129
Unpublished

46 F.3d 1129

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Victor Eugene VICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor MARK; Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Medical
Section, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7073.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 13, 1994.
Decided: January 18, 1995.

Victor Eugene Vick, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.