green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ibrahim v. Bernhardt
But such considerations do not rank in importance with the right and the duty of a litigant to present his demands through counsel of his own choosing and in a style and form of expression which represent the attorney’s honest effort to present the claims according to his own notions of their merits and their strong and weak points.”); see also, e.g., Gordon v. Green, 602 F.2d 743, 745 (5th Cir. 1979) (considering an eighteen (18) volume pleading in excess of 4,000 pages not short within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)); but see Jumonville v. Dep’t of Treasury, 50 F.3…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jacody Rose v. Homer Plessy Community School et al
Tex. Sept. 7, 2012) (citing Cavaliere v. Burke, 50 F.3d 1033, at *4 (5th Cir. 1995); see 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(d)(1) (defining a “consumer report” as “communication of any information ... which is used or expected to be used or collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumer's eligibility ....”) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Schlumbrecht v. Topel
Jumonville v. Dep’t of Treasury, 50 F.3d 1033, at *2 (5th Cir. 1995) (quotations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rokit Drinks LLC v. Landry's Inc.
Texas law holds, “Application of the statute of frauds to a contract vitiates a fraud claim based on the same facts.” Collins v Allied Pharmacy Management Inc, 871 SW2d 929, 936 (Tex App—Houston [14th Dist] 1994, no writ); accord Wilson v Dallas Cowboys Football Club Inc, 50 F3d 1033 , 1995 WL 136496, *2 (5th Cir, per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Selsky
See Davis v. Wall, 50 F.3d 1033, n. 3 (5th Cir.1995) (“To the extent that Davis attempts to seek relief on behalf of other AVC inmates, his attempts are futile because this is not a class action”); Butler v. Dowd, 979 F.2d 661, 674 (8th Cir.1992) (“This is not a class action. [Plaintiff], therefore, is not entitled to the injunctive relief he requests”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weber v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
See, e.g., eaveliee v. Burke, 50 F.3d 1033 , 1995 WL 136229 , at *3—4 (Sth Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (unpublished); Ippolito v. WNS, Inc., 864 F.2d 440 445, 449-50 (7th Cir.1988) abrogated on other grounds by Safeco Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelly Hall v. Phenix Investigations, Inc.
Co. of Amer. v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47 , 127 S.Ct. 2201 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1045 (2007) (recognizing that use of reports in trademark litigation is a commercial purpose and therefore cannot constitute “consumer reports” under the Act); see also Cavaliere v. Burke, 50 F.3d 1033 , 1995 WL 136229, at *3-4 (5th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (citing Ippolito favorably and noting that “not every credit report is a consumer report” under the FCRA).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farm Credit Bank
v.
Firemans Fund
v.
Firemans Fund
18-31115.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 13, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Farm Credit Bank
v.
Firemans Fund
NO. 94-40583
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Mar 13, 1995
1
Appeal From: W.D.La., No. 3:91-CV-2230, 822 F.Supp. 1251
2
AFFIRMED.