green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Continental Cargo-Denver
See generally O’Neal v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 848 F.Supp. 413, 417-19 (W.D.N.Y.1994) (citing cases and describing approaches), aff’d, 60 F.3d 812 (2d Cir.1995) (Table).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Benjamin Gary Triestman, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Triestman v. United States, 60 F.3d 812 (2d Cir.1995) (Table).
cited
Cited "see"
Pritzker v. City of Hudson
Pritzker Dep., at 55-59; see Owens v. Colburn, 860 F.Supp. 966, 972 (N.D.N.Y.1994), aff'd, 60 F.3d 812 (2d Cir.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Ben Gary Triestman v. United States
See Triestman v. United States, 60 F.3d 812 (2d Cir.1995) (unpublished table decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kalfus v. New York & Presbyterian Hospital
Tracy v. Freshwater, 623 F.3d at 96 ; see also Owens v. Colburn, 860 F.Supp. 966, 972-73 (N.D.N.Y.1994) (granting summary judgment on excessive force claim where arrestee failed to warn officer of preexisting back injury before handcuffing), aff'd 60 F.3d 812 (2d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rasmussen v. Sigma Corp. of America
Interestingly, while there does not appear to be a Second Circuit opinion directly on point, virtually every court to have considered the issue has held “that the 90-day period runs from the day the notice is received by someone at the claimant’s residence, such as a spouse or a high school age child, even if the worker does not see the notice until days or weeks later.” Griffin v. Prince William Hospital Corp., 716 F.Supp. 919 , 921 & n. 5 (E.D.Va.1989) (citing cases); see also O’Neal v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 848 F.Supp. 413 , 417 W.D.N.Y.1994) (“upon a careful reading of the l…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garth Conlan v. United States Department of Labor
See, e.g., Avila v. A Sam & Sons, 856 F.Supp. 763 (W.D.N.Y.1994) (holding agricultural employer violated section 1823(a) when migrant workers slept outside and in a van on premises because employer was aware of the housing violations and allowed the migrant workers to stay), aff'd, 60 F.3d 812 (2d Cir.1995) (unpublished disposition).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flick
v.
Sweatt
v.
Sweatt
94-2749.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 26, 1995.
Published
Flick
v.
Sweatt
NO. 94-2749
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
June 26, 1995
Appeal From: N.D.N.Y. 93-cv-1082
1
AFFIRMED.