Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc. v. Watson, 262 F.2d 34 (D.C. Cir. 1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc. v. Watson, 262 F.2d 34 (D.C. Cir. 1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Winfred Overholser v. Herbert T. O'Beirne (cadc, 1962-06-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Winfred Overholser v. Herbert T. O'Beirne (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1962 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Rosenfield v. Overholser, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 322 , 262 F.2d 34 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GODFREY L. CABOT, INC.
v.
Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents
No. 14517.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Nov 28, 1958.
262 F.2d 34
Mr. Harold T. Stowell, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Harold L. Stowell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Joseph Schimmel, Attorney, United States Patent Office, with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant in a suit under 35 U.S.C. § 145 to obtain a patent. The District Court thought the claims lacked invention. We find no error.

Affirmed.