No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF OREGON
v.
MICHAEL BLISS, aka DANIEL HERBERT KING
v.
MICHAEL BLISS, aka DANIEL HERBERT KING
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jun 21, 1971.
Carl E. Mauts, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant., Thomas R. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem.
Foley, Schwab, Thornton.
Published
Affirmed from the bench.