Angerlino v. United States, 269 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Angerlino v. United States, 269 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest negative: Earl R. Cephus v. United States (cadc, 1963-09-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Earl R. Cephus v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1963 · signal: but cf. · confidence bake:cell
But cf. United States v. Goldstein, 168 F.2d 666, 669-670 (2d Cir. 1948) 18 In Middleton v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 50 , 269 F.2d 241 (1959), the Government apparently conceded this point, but argued that defendant's acquiescence in co-defendant's attempt to provide an alibi for all the defendants was a waiver, since he might have moved for a severance.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles R. ANGERLINO
v.
United States
No. 15072.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 18, 1959.
269 F.2d 241
Mr. Arrnand I. Robinson (appointed by the District Court), Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. Walter J. Bonner, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for ap-pellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of housebreaking and larceny. We find no error.

Affirmed.