green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gloria Abram v. Department of the Treasury
See Baig v. Department of the Navy, 66 M.S.P.R. 269 , 275 (stating that, although an agency may retain a litigation file, it must observe appropriate safeguards to protect the appellant’s employment prospects and confidentiality of the file), aff’d, 64 F.3d 677 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
John T. Park v. Department of the Navy
See Gregory v. Office of Personnel Management, 66 M.S.P.R. 691 , 698, aff’d, 64 F.3d 677 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Rokki Knee Carr v. Social Security Administration
See Thomas v. Department of Defense, 66 M.S.P.R. 546 , 549-52 (1995), aff'd, 64 F.3d 677 (Fed.Cir.1995) (Table).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert Swift
v.
United States Postal Service
v.
United States Postal Service
95-3093.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Aug 17, 1995.
Unpublished
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Robert SWIFT, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 95-3093.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Aug. 17, 1995.
Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
1
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.