Eric Erwin Collier v. James B. Hunt, Governor, 67 F.3d 294 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Eric Erwin Collier v. James B. Hunt, Governor, 67 F.3d 294 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“cramer admitted that his job required him to work long hours, on weekends, and at home, so he can hardly claim now that work he did at home was by definition not within the scope of his employment.”
50 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fleurimond v. New York University (nyed, 2012-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Fleurimond v. New York University
E.D.N.Y · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
cramer admitted that his job required him to work long hours, on weekends, and at home, so he can hardly claim now that work he did at home was by definition not within the scope of his employment.
cited Cited "see" The Kanawha-Gauley Coal & Coke Company v. Pittston Minerals Group, Inc.
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carolina Pizza Huts, 67 F.3d 294 ; State ex rel.
cited Cited "see" Horizon Holdings, LLC v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.
D. Kan. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carolina Pizza Huts, Inc. v. Woodward, 67 F.3d 294 , 1995 WL 572902 , at *3 (4th Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eric Erwin Collier
v.
James B. Hunt, Governor
19-1609.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 12, 1995.
67 F.3d 294

67 F.3d 294

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eric Erwin COLLIER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
James B. Hunt, Governor, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6037.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1995.

Eric Erwin Collier, appellant pro se.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Collier v. Hunt, No. CA-94-684-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.