William T. Proctor v. Warden, Nottoway Corr. Ctr., 68 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
William T. Proctor v. Warden, Nottoway Corr. Ctr., 68 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ingram v. USA - 2255 (mdd, 2020-04-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ingram v. USA - 2255
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Collins, 68 F.3d 461 (Table), 1995 WL 606786, at *1 (4th Cir. 1995) (stating that because the defendant “failed to show he was prejudiced by counsel’s actions, and only asserted conclusory allegations, the district court properly denied relief” on the defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims); Gorham-Bey v. United States, No. RWT-11-3238, 2013 WL 715148 , at *4 (D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wagner v. United States
D.S.C. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
As numerous courts have noted, “[m]ere eonclusory allegations in support of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel are insufficient to raise a constitutional issue.” Green v. Johnson, 160 F.3d 1029, 1042 (5th Cir.1998); see also United States v. Collins, 68 F.3d 461 , 1995 WL 606786, *1 (4th Cir.1995) (“Because Collins failed to show he was prejudiced by counsel’s actions, and only asserted eonclusory allegations, the district court properly denied relief on Collins’s claims of ineffective assistance ■ of counsel.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William T. Proctor
v.
Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center
95-6154.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 23, 1995.
68 F.3d 461
Unpublished

68 F.3d 461

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William T. PROCTOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-6154.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 12, 1995.
Decided: Oct. 23, 1995.

William T. Proctor, Appellant Pro Se.

Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.[*] We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Proctor v. Warden, Nottoway, No. CA-94-829 (E.D.Va. Jan. 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

The parties consented to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)