Leamon Partin v. Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker, 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Leamon Partin v. Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker, 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Buckley v. Archdiocese of Rockville Centre (nyed, 1998-02-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Buckley v. Archdiocese of Rockville Centre
E.D.N.Y · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Ins. v. Alcatel, 876 F.Supp. 748, 755 (E.D.N.C.) (declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims where ripening of federal ERISA claim was “totally dependent” upon disposition of state law claims), aff'd., 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir.1995); Bodenner v. Graves, 828 F.Supp. 516, 518 (W.D.Mieh.1993) (where ease presented a single valid federal claim, court would not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over twenty-eight state law claims).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leamon Partin
v.
Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker
95-7216.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 20, 1995.
72 F.3d 127
Published

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leamon PARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN; Louis R. Colombo; Cecelia M. Goetz;
Juanita H. Baker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7216.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Leamon Partin, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Partin v. Freeman, No. CA-95-588-5 (E.D.N.C. July 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED