Daniels v. United States Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 72 F.3d 775 (9th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Daniels v. United States Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 72 F.3d 775 (9th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Puryear (ca9, 2005-03-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Puryear
9th Cir. · 2005 · confidence medium
United States v. LaRizza, 72 F.3d 775, 780 (9th Cir.1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Martinez
D. Or. · 1996 · confidence medium
It focuses on the defendant’s state of mind before government agents suggest that he commit the crime.” United States v. LaRizza, 72 F.3d 775, 778 (9th Cir.1995) (emphasis added).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Martinez
D. Or. · 1996 · confidence medium
It focuses on the defendant's state of mind before government agents suggest that he commit the crime." United States v. LaRizza, 72 F.3d 775, 778 (9th Cir.1995) (emphasis added).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Antonio Rafael Montero-Morlotti
9th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. LaRizza, 72 F.3d 775, 778 (9th Cir.1995). 11 Defendant next argues that the district court erred in not granting an adjustment in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Anthony Gregg Payton
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Larizza, 72 F.3d 775 (9th Cir.1995) (approving an instruction that did not state that the predisposition must exist "immediately" before the government contact); United States v. Lessard, 17 F.3d 303, 305 (9th Cir.1994) (not discussing an immediacy requirement and holding that an entrapment instruction "must 'tell the jury that the government was required to show that [the defendant] was predisposed to commit the illegal acts prior to the initial contact by government agents.").
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benton D. BURT, Defendant-Appellant
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. LaRizza, 72 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.1995) (where defendant requested production of informant on the second day of defendant’s second trial, government acted reasonably by disclosing the informant’s identity and last known address).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr.
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California, Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison the Attorney General of the State of California, Real Parties in Interest
94-70295.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 28, 1995.
72 F.3d 775
Published

72 F.3d 775

Jackson Chambers DANIELS, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison; the
Attorney General of the State of California, Real
Parties in Interest.

No. 94-70295.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1995.

Before: FERGUSON, NORRIS, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED.

2

This court's opinion, filed July 18, 1995, is hereby WITHDRAWN.