Michael Wayne Montgomery, A/K/A Shaka MacUmba Zulu X v. John Doe Laurie Bessinger Vaughn Jackson, Captain, 76 F.3d 374 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Michael Wayne Montgomery, A/K/A Shaka MacUmba Zulu X v. John Doe Laurie Bessinger Vaughn Jackson, Captain, 76 F.3d 374 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael Wayne Montgomery, A/K/A Shaka MacUmba Zulu X
v.
John Doe Laurie Bessinger Vaughn Jackson, Captain
95-7135.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 13, 1996.
76 F.3d 374
Unpublished

76 F.3d 374

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Wayne MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John DOE; Laurie Bessinger; Vaughn Jackson, Captain,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 23, 1996.
Decided: February 13, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1199-CV-6-3AK)

Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Ellis, Lawhorne, Davidson & Sims, P.A., Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his pretrial motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED