United States v. Steele, 105 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
United States v. Steele, 105 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“steele i”
11 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM O. STEELE
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM O. STEELE
unknown court · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
steele i
cited Cited "see" United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Steele, 105 F.3d 603, 607 (11th Cir.1997) (“Steele I ”), superseded on reh’g, 117 F.3d 1231 (1997) (“Steele II”).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Steele
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Steele, 105 F.3d 603, 607 (11th Cir.1997) ("Steele I "), superseded on reh'g, 117 F.3d 1231 (1997) ("Steele II ").
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. McArthur
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Steele, 105 F.3d 603 (11th Cir.1997) (extending Outler from physicians to pharmacists). 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Steele
94-3139.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 11, 1997.
105 F.3d 603

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-3139

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, versus

WILLIAM O. STEELE, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

-------------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida --------------------------

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion: 117 F.3d 1231, 11th Cir. July 24, 1997)

(December 4, 1997)

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.