Housley v. Sheriff, Lipscomb, 52 F.3d 1068 (5th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Housley v. Sheriff, Lipscomb, 52 F.3d 1068 (5th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Sampy v. Unknown
W.D. La. · 2025 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a criminal defendant who is represented by counsel has meaningful access to the courts vis-a-vis the criminal action pending against him.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Arceneaux v. Williams
W.D. La. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a criminal defendant who is represented by counsel has meaningful access to the courts vis-a-vis the criminal action pending against him.
discussed Cited "see" Sandoval v. Davis
S.D. Tex. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Covorubbia, 52 F.3d 1068 , 1995 WL 241813 at *3-4 (5th Cir. April 14, 1995) (per curiam) (unpublished). 56 See Court Reporter’s Record, vol. 3 [Doc. # 9-10], at 206-07, 235. decision is not otherwise entitled to deference on federal habeas corpus review.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Van Winkle v. Rogers
W.D. La. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence medium
SUMMERHAYS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ” “Tefects are not presumed to be present by the mere happening of an accident.” Spott v. Otis Elevator Co., 601 So.2d 1355, 1364 (La. 1992); see also Dudenhefer v. Davol, Inc., 52 F.3d 1068, *4 (Sth Cir. 1995); Krummel v. Bombardier Corp., 206 F.3d 548, 551 (Sth Cir. 2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Housley
v.
Sheriff, Lipscomb
95-10100.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 18, 1995.
52 F.3d 1068

52 F.3d 1068

Housley
v.
Sheriff, Lipscomb County[*]

NO. 95-10100

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Apr 13, 1995

Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 2:92-CV-43

1

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2