examined Cited as authority (rule) Wilson v. John/Jane Doe (3×) also: Cited "see" People v. Wilson, 30 N.Y.3d 984, 984 (2017); People v. Wilson, 30 N.Y.3d 984, 984 (2017). e Petitioner alleges that on August 15, 2017, he filed a motion pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”) § 5015 that was received by the Bronx County Court, but never filed.

discussed Cited "see" People v. Wilson Defendant's remaining complaints about defense counsel's performance are based on "matters that are outside the record on appeal and thus must be raised, if at all, by way of a CPL [*2]article 440 motion" ( People v Quick , 187 AD3d 1612, 1614 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1053 [2021]; see generally People v Timmons , 151 AD3d 1682, 1684 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 984 [2017]).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Woodard We conclude that the court did not err in denying defendant's request to provide the jury with a multiple conspiracies charge inasmuch as "[t]here was no reasonable view of the evidence that there was any conspiracy [other] than the single conspiracy charged in the indictment" ( id. at 1564-1565 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Williams , 150 AD3d 1315, 1320 [3d Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 984 [2017]).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Johnson Defendant was not convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance, for which "some additional evidence establishing the existence of [the controlled substance]" in addition to intercepted communications would have been required ( People v Martin , 81 AD3d 1178, 1179 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 819 [2011]; see People v Williams , 150 AD3d 1315, 1318 [2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 984 [2017]).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Lasher Defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence disproving justification is unpreserved for our review because his motion for a trial order of dismissal was not " specifically directed' at" that alleged shortcoming in the evidence ( People v Gray , 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; see People v Timmons , 151 AD3d 1682, 1683 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 984 [2017]; People v Stoby , 4 AD3d 766, 766 [4th Dept 2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 807 [2004]).

discussed Cited "see" People v. Rice We note that defendant's request that the court nevertheless receive his mental health records was, in fact, addressed by his counsel when these records were admitted into evidence by stipulation at his counsel's behest. "[V]iewed in totality and as of the time of the representation," defendant received meaningful representation, as his counsel made appropriate pretrial motions, actively cross-examined witnesses, obtained a reduction in the counts against defendant, and successfully requested that lesser included offenses be considered ( People v Baldi , 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; accord People …