Fort Belknap Indian Cmty. v. State Of Montana, 84 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Fort Belknap Indian Cmty. v. State Of Montana, 84 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Babbitt (ca10, 1997-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Babbitt
10th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Under the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A), as a reviewing court, we must set aside the Secretary’s action if it is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.” See Washington v. Department of Transp., 84 F.3d 1222, 1224 (10th Cir.1996); Osborne v. Babbitt, 61 F.3d 810, 812 (10th Cir.1995).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sonic Restaurants v. Kruger (2×) also: Cited "see"
10th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Upon de novo review, Kaul v. Stephan, 83 F.3d 1208, 1212 (10th Cir.1996), we affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court's orders of March 22 and May 29, 1996. 4 Most of the objections broadly stated in defendants' appellate brief "lack even rudimentary substantiation in factual argument and legal authority." Washington v. Department of Transp., 84 F.3d 1222, 1223 (10th Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" Intermodal Technologies, Incor v. Mary Peters
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. Dep’t of Transp., 84 F.3d 1222, 1223-25 (10th Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" Air Brake Systems, Inc. v. Norman Y. Mineta, in His Capacity as Secretary of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. Dep’t of Transp., 84 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" Air Brake Sys v. Mineta
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. Dep’t of Transp., 84 F.3d 1222 to MAC Trailer in response to its earlier oral inquiry and a (10th Cir. 1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation
v.
State of Montana, Robert L. Robinson, Individually and as Administrator, Gambling Control Division, Department of Justice, State of Montana Stan Stephens, Individually and as Governor, State of Montana Marc Racicot, Individually and as Attorney General, State of Montana
94-35126.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 7, 1996.
84 F.3d 1222
Published

84 F.3d 1222

The FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY OF the FORT BELKNAP INDIAN
RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MONTANA, Robert L. Robinson, individually and as
Administrator, Gambling Control Division, Department of
Justice, State of Montana; Stan Stephens, individually and
as Governor, State of Montana; Marc Racicot, individually
and as Attorney General, State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-35126.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 7, 1996.

1

James L. Vogel, Hardin, Montana, for plaintiff-appellant.

2

Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, and Deanne L. Sandholm, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana, for defendants-appellees.

3

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

4

Before: BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge.[*]

ORDER

5

The judgment of this court, 39 F.3d 1186 (Table), is vacated. For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996), we affirm the judgment of the district court.

6

AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable William H. Orrick, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation