United States v. James Earl Poteet, 95 F.3d 43 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. James Earl Poteet, 95 F.3d 43 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
James Earl Poteet
96-6723.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 21, 1996.
95 F.3d 43
Unpublished

95 F.3d 43

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
James Earl POTEET, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 96-6723.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 15, 1996.
Decided Aug. 21, 1996.

James Earl Poteet, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Poteet, Nos. CR-89-136; CA-96-30 (E.D.Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED