Ingram Corp. v. Circle, Inc., 190 So. 2d 232 (La. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Ingram Corp. v. Circle, Inc., 190 So. 2d 232 (La. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Neeb-Kearney and Co., Inc. v. Rellstab (lactapp, 1992-01-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Neeb-Kearney and Co., Inc. v. Rellstab
La. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ingram, Corp. v. Circle, Inc., 188 So.2d 96 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ refused 249 La. 712 , 190 So.2d 232 (La.1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
INGRAM CORPORATION and Ingram Contractors, Inc.
v.
CIRCLE, INCORPORATED, and Monroe J. Wolfe
No. 48322.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 5, 1966.
190 So. 2d 232
Consideration, Error, Granted, Limited, McCaleb, Relators, Should.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

In re: Circle, Incorporated, and Monroe J. Wolfe applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 188 So.2d 96.

Writ refused. No error of law under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.

McCALEB, J., thinks that a writ should be granted but limited to a consideration of relators’ assignment of error IV.