Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corp., 98 F.3d 618 (11th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corp., 98 F.3d 618 (11th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Jok v. City of Burlington, Vermont (vtd, 2022-02-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jok v. City of Burlington, Vermont
D. Vt. · 2022 · confidence medium
As discussed above, supervisory liability requires that a constitutional "violation must be established against the supervisory official directly.” Tangreti, 98 F.3d at 618.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lora LOHR, Michael Lohr, Her Husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MEDTRONIC, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
94-2516.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Oct 28, 1996.
98 F.3d 618
Daniel C. Shaughnessy, Cowles & Shaugh-nessy, PA., Jacksonville, FL, Robert F. Spohrer, Spohrer, Wilner & Maxwell, PA, Jacksonville, FL, Brian Wolfman, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellants., Dennis P. Waggoner, Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, FL, Marcus R. Magnuson, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, Daniel G. Jareho, McKenna & Cuneo, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee.
Black, Barkett, Roney.
Published

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:

On June 26, 1996, the Supreme Court reversed this panel’s opinion in Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc., 56 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir.1995). See Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996). Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now reverse the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint and remand the ease to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.