Mazza-Alaluf v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 425 (2010). · Go Syfert
Mazza-Alaluf v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 425 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Preacely (ca2, 2010-12-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Preacely (2×)
2d Cir. · 2010 · signal: accord · confidence high
See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. at 59-60, 128 S.Ct. 586 ; United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d at 189 ; accord United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 621 F.3d 205, 214 (2d Cir.2010) ("Because the district court has a particular advantage in assessing the evidence and the defendant, we accord it considerable deference in assigning weight to relevant sentencing factors."), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 583 , 178 L.Ed.2d 425 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c and
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 621 F.3d 205, 212 (2d Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 583 , 178 L.Ed.2d 425 (2010) (defining "receive” in the context of a Michigan statute dealing with money transmission services); United States v. Olander, 572 F.3d 764, 769 (9th Cir.2009), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 1135 , 130 S.Ct. 1113 , 175 L.Ed.2d 924 (2010) (defining “receive” in the context of a Federal child pornography statute); United States v. Mohrbacher, 182 F.3d 1041, 1048 (9th Cir.1999) (same); United States v. Flippen, 861 F.2d 266 (4th Cir.1988) (same); United States …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leyva-Martinez
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1197 (9th Cir.2009), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 583 , 178 L.Ed.2d 425 (2010); Butler v. Curry, 528 F.3d 624, 643-44 (9th Cir.) (citing cases), cert, denied — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 767 , 172 L.Ed.2d 763 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Andujar
2d Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Substantive Reasonableness A defendant challenging the substantive reasonableness of a sentence bears a heavy *564 burden because we afford sentencing courts “very wide latitude to decide the proper degree of punishment for an individual offender and a particular crime.” United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d at 188 ; see also United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 621 F.3d 205, 214 (2d Cir.2010) (“Because the district court has a particular advantage in assessing the evidence and the defendant, we accord it considerable deference in assigning weight to relevant sentencing factors”), cert. denied, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mauricio Alfonso Mazza-Alaluf
v.
United States
No. 10-6868.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 425
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 621 F.3d 205.