Garza v. United States, 179 L. Ed. 2d 293 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Garza v. United States, 179 L. Ed. 2d 293 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Harris (ca10, 2014-11-14) · Strongest negative: State v. Ball (nh, 2012-09-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" State v. Ball
N.H. · 2012 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Colbert, 605 F.3d 573, 578 (8th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 1469 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harris (2×)
10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garza v. United States, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1469, 1469 , 179 L.Ed.2d 293 (2011) (vacating the dismissal of a § 2255 motion and remanding for reconsideration "in light of Magwood "). .
discussed Cited "see" Gary Wayne Betzner v. United States
11th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garza v. United States, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1469 , 179 L.Ed.2d 293 (2011) (vacating and remanding for the court of appeals to reconsider whether the defendant's section 2255 motion was successive in the light of Magwood, which was decided after the appellate court's initial decision). 4 .
cited Cited "see" Campbell v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
11th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garza v. United States, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1469 , 179 L.Ed.2d 293 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Luis Alejandro Garza
v.
United States
No. 10-6521.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 293
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Magwood v. Patterson, 561 U.S. 320, 130 S. Ct. 2788, 177 L. Ed. 2d 592 (2010).

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 481.