green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“neither the fact that individuals and not the state are named as defendants in this action, nor the fact plaintiffs characterize the relief sought as equitable, overcomes the eleventh amendment bar”
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bloom v. Fischer
neither the fact that individuals and not the state are named as defendants in this action, nor the fact plaintiffs characterize the relief sought as equitable, overcomes the eleventh amendment bar
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Proper
See Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 497 , 114 S.Ct. 1732 , 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994); see also, e.g., United States v. Ruvalcaba, 627 F.3d 218, 222 (6th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2133 , 179 L.Ed.2d 920 (2011); United States v. Dean, 604 F.3d 169, 174 (4th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 342 , 178 L.Ed.2d 223 (2010); United States v. El-Alamin, 574 F.3d 915, 928 (8th Cir.2009); Wilson-El v. Finnan, 544 F.3d 762, 765 (7th Cir.2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert Edgerton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 10-9546.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 2011.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 733.