green
Positive treatment
9.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
O'Halloran v. First Union National Bank of Florida
Rentals, Ltd. v. Seabring Marine Indus., Inc., 168 F.3d 413, 415-16 (11th Cir.1999) (noting that "the possessor of property obtained via a worthless check has `voidable' title to the property-the possessor has title, but the seller can avoid that title as against the buyer upon discovery of the fraud"); Mazzoni Farms, Inc. v. E.I.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
O'Halloran v. First Union National Bank of Florida
Rentals, Ltd. v. Seabring Marine Indus., Inc., 168 F.3d 413, 415-16 (11th Cir.1999) (noting that “the possessor of property obtained via a worthless check has ‘voidable’ title to the property-the possessor has title, but the seller can avoid that title as against the buyer upon discovery of the fraud”); Mazzoni Farms, Inc. v. E.I.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Driscoll v. Adams
Rentals Ltd. v. Seabring Marine Indus., Inc., 168 F.3d 413, 415 (11th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Driscoll v. Adams
Rentals Ltd. v. Seabring Marine Indus., Inc., 168 F.3d 413, 415 (11th Cir. 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
B.R.L. Equipment
v.
Seabring Marine
v.
Seabring Marine
96-3637.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 23, 1999.
168 F.3d 413
Published
COX, Circuit Judge, specially concurring:
I join Judge Tjoflat’s opinion for the court except for the two consecutive paragraphs that conclude the acceptance of checks is an extension of credit. The first of these paragraphs begins: “Whenever a seller,” etc. I concur in the judgment.