Analytical Diagnostic Labs, Inc. v. Kusel, 180 L. Ed. 2d 247 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Analytical Diagnostic Labs, Inc. v. Kusel, 180 L. Ed. 2d 247 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vaher v. Town of Orangetown
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vaher v. Town of Orangetown
unknown court · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Stated differently, a plaintiff asserting a “class of one” equal protection claim must allege that the intentional disparate treatment alleged to state the first element of the claim was “wholly arbitrary” or “irrational.” Aliberti v. Town of Brookhaven, 876 F.Supp.2d 153, 163-64 (E.D.N.Y.2012) (citing Giordano v. City of New York, 274 F.3d 740, 751 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also Analytical Diagnostic Labs, Inc. v. Kusel, 626 F.3d 135, 140 (2d Cir.2010), cert. denied — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2970 , 180 L.Ed.2d 247 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Analytical Diagnostic Labs, Inc.
v.
Betty Kusel
No. 10-1232.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 2011.
180 L. Ed. 2d 247
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 626 F.3d 135.