Montero v. United States, 565 U.S. 979 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Montero v. United States, 565 U.S. 979 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“roviding additional non-discriminatory reasons that do not conflict with the one stated at time of discharge does not constitute shifting justifications.”
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Patterson v. Easton Motorcars LLC (ohsd, 2021-08-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Patterson v. Easton Motorcars LLC
S.D. Ohio · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
roviding additional non-discriminatory reasons that do not conflict with the one stated at time of discharge does not constitute shifting justifications.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adolfo Sandor Montero
v.
United States
No. 11-310.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 2011.
565 U.S. 979
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 738.