green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hibbs
See Florida v. Jardines, _ U.S. _, 132 S.Ct. 995 , 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nisar Mulla v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Because “proof of prejudice is necessary to establish a due process violation in an immigration hearing,” id., “we need not address the merits of a [due process] claim if’ the alien fails to demonstrate prejudice, Graham v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 546, 549 (6th Cir.2008); see Ikharo v. Holder, 614 F.3d 622, 631 (6th Cir.2010), vacated on other grounds, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 997 , 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012). “[T]o establish the requisite prejudice, [the alien] must show that the due process violations led to a substantially different outcome from that which would have occurred in the absence of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bi Qing Zheng v. Loretta Lynch
Graham v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 546, 549 (6th Cir.2008); see also Ikharo v. Holder, 614 F.3d 622, 631 (6th Cir.2010), vacated on other *297 grounds, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 997 , 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012). “[T]o establish the' requisite prejudice, [the petitioner] must show that the due process violations led to a substantially different outcome from that which would have occurred in the absence of those violations.” Graham, 519 F.3d at 549-50 ; see Garza-Moreno v. Gonzales, 489 F.3d 239, 241 (6th Cir.2007) (“An alien must establish ... substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process challeng…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election Commission
See also Bluman v. FEC, 800 F.Supp.2d 281 (D.D.C.2011) (three-judge court) (upholding ban on contributions by foreign nationals, 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (a)), summ. aff'd, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1087 , 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States
See, e.g., Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510, 522 , 123 S.Ct. 1708 , 155 L.Ed.2d 724 (2003); Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 78-80 , 96 S.Ct. 1883 , 48 L.Ed.2d 478 (1976); see also Bluman v. FEC, 800 F.Supp.2d 281, 287 (D.D.C.2011), affirmed, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1087 , 181 L.Ed.2d 726 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florida
v.
Joelis Jardines
v.
Joelis Jardines
No. 11-564.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 2012.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida granted limited to Question I presented by the petition.
Same case below, 73 So. 3d 34.