Umer v. Holder, 565 U.S. 1105 (2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Umer v. Holder, 565 U.S. 1105 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“rivate parties are not generally acting under 27 color of state law”
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (PC) Pratt v. Sacramento Protection Services (caed, 2023-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) (PC) Pratt v. Sacramento Protection Services
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
rivate parties are not generally acting under 27 color of state law
discussed Cited "see" Khan v. Barela
D.N.M. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See [Doc. 112] at 10, ¶ 9–10 (citing Montano v. Hedgepeth, 120 F.3d 844 , 849–51 (8th Cir. 1997) and Florer v. Congregation Pidyon Shevuyim, N.A., 639 F.3d 916 , 925–26 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1000 (2012)).
cited Cited "see" Rabieh v. Paragon Sys. Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Florer v. Congregation Pidyon Shevuyim, N.A. , 639 F.3d 916 , 922 (9th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted), cert. denied , 565 U.S. 1116 , 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 743 (2012).
cited Cited "see" Jonathan Cruzaldovinos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Salem v. Holder, 647 F.3d 111, 114-15 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" Carrasco-Chavez v. Holder
4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Salem v. Holder, 647 F.3d 111 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012) (holding that where the relevant evidence of conviction is “in equipoise,” a petitioner has not satisfied his statutory burden to prove eligibility for relief from removal).
discussed Cited "see" Young v. Holder (2×)
9th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Salem v. Holder, 647 F.3d 111, 115-16 (4th Cir. 2011) (holding that an inconclusive record is insufficient to carry the alien’s burden of demonstrating eligibility for cancellation of removal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1000 , 181 L.Ed.2d 733 (2012); Garcia v. Holder, 584 F.3d 1288, 1289-90 (10th Cir.2009) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Khalid Umer
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General
No. 11-144.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2012.
565 U.S. 1105
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 79%
Citer courts: E.D. California (1)

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Judulang v. Holder, 565 U.S. 42, 132 S. Ct. 476, 181 L. Ed. 2d 449 (2011).

Same case below, 417 Fed. Appx. 403.