Breland v. United States, 565 U.S. 1153 (2012). · Go Syfert
Breland v. United States, 565 U.S. 1153 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Cite instead
Still-good law most often cited alongside it: Molignaro (2011) · Breland (2011) · Grant (2011)
“a below-guidelines sentence is presumptively reasonable.”
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Susi (ca4, 2012-03-21) · Strongest negative: United States v. Todd Culbertson (ca5, 2013-03-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Vacated United States v. Todd Culbertson
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Breland, 647 F.3d 284, 290 (5th Cir. 2011) (“Breland I”), vacated by Breland v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 1096 (2012).
cited Vacated United States v. Todd Culbertson
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Breland, 647 F.3d 284, 290 (5th Cir.2011) ("Breland I”), vacated by Breland v. United States, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1096 , 181 L.Ed.2d 973 (2012).
cited Vacated United States v. Franklin Garcia
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Breland, 647 F.3d 284 (5th Cir.2011), vacated by — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1096 , 181 L.Ed.2d 973 (2012).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Susi
4th Cir. · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a below-guidelines sentence is presumptively reasonable.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Taylor
8th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Breland v. United States, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1096 , 181 L.Ed.2d 973 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William C. Breland, Jr.
v.
United States
No. 11-6912.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 2012.
565 U.S. 1153

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on December 19, 2011.

Same case below, 647 F.3d 284.