In Re Judith Ward Mattox, 106 F.3d 426 (Fed. Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Judith Ward Mattox, 106 F.3d 426 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Skillo v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
Trust v. United States, 65 Fed.Cl. 638, 641 (2005); Lyashenko v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 626, 630 (1998); accord Harris v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 470, 473 (1995) (finding that a pro se plaintiff failed to prove full payment of taxes and dismissing the action because “[bjefore this court has jurisdiction over a tax refund case, the claimant must demonstrate that he paid the taxes in question and timely filed a claim for their refund with the IRS”), aff'd, 106 F.3d 426 (Fed.Cir.1997) (table); New York Life Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Hunsaker v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harris v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 470, 473 (1995), aff'd, 106 F.3d 426 (Fed.Cir.1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1222 , 117 S.Ct. 1718 , 137 L.Ed.2d 841 (1997) (holding that the pro se plaintiff failed to prove full payment of taxes and dismissing the action because “before this court has jurisdiction over a tax refund case, the claimant must demonstrate he paid the taxes in question and timely filed a claim for their refund with the IRS”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doe/70 v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
Fed. Cl. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See RCFC App. B, Rule 8(f)(1) (“Any fact or argument not raised specifically in the record before the special master will be considered waived and cannot be raised by either party in proceedings on review of a special master’s decision.”); see also Hellenbrand-Sztaba v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 35 Fed.Cl. 222, 225 (1996) (citing Weddel v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 23 F.3d 388 , 390 n. 2 (Fed.Cir.1994) and Jay v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 998 F.2d 979, 983 (Fed.Cir.1993)), aff'd per curiam, 106 F.3d 426 (Fed.Cir.1997) (unpublished table opini…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Biddulph v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Harris v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 470, 472 (1995), aff'd, 106 F.3d 426 (Fed.Cir.1997) (table).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Judith Ward Mattox
96-5115.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jan 15, 1997.
106 F.3d 426
Unpublished

106 F.3d 426

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
In re Judith Ward MATTOX.

No. 96-5115.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 15, 1997.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.