Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Overland Express, Inc., 114 S. Ct. 2095 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Overland Express, Inc., 114 S. Ct. 2095 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: East Coast Intermodal Systems, Inc. v. Sea-Barge Group, Inc. (flsd, 1994-06-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" East Coast Intermodal Systems, Inc. v. Sea-Barge Group, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brizendine v. Cotter & Co., 4 F.3d 457 (7th Cir.1993), vacated and remanded,-U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2095 , 128 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Overland Express, Inc. v. ICC., 996 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1993), vacated and remanded,-U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2095 , 128 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Scholastic Tv Programming Foundation v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
NLRB Union v. FLRA, 834 F.2d 191, 195 (D.C.Cir.1987); see also Overland Express, Inc. v. ICC, 996 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1993) ("[W]e generally allow claims ... that a regulation is in excess of statutory authority when raised as a defense to an agency enforcement action" irrespective of statutory time limits), vacated on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2095 , 128 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); American Tel. & Tel.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Scholastic TV Programming Foundation v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
NLRB Union v. FLRA, 834 F.2d 191, 195 (D.C.Cir.1987); see also Overland Express, Inc. v. ICC, 996 F.2d 356 (D.C.Cir.1993) (”[W]e generally allow claims ... that a regulation is in excess of statutoiy authority when raised as a defense to an agency enforcement action” irrespective of statutory time limits), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2095 , 128 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); American Tel. & Tel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States
v.
OVERLAND EXPRESS, INC.
No. 93-883.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1994.
114 S. Ct. 2095
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 677, 126 L.Ed.2d 645 (1994).

Justice GINSBURG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.