green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Limited
Simms v. City of New York
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep’t, 158 F.3d 635, 647 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999) (rejecting police officers’ argument that their assignment to light duty positions, which relieved them from any physical “confrontations”, permitted the inference that the officers were substantially limited in their ability to work); Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 32 F.3d 718, 724 (2d Cir.1994) (finding that plaintiff was only precluded from working in one place in hospital — the blood bank — and was therefore, not substantially limi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Randall v. United Petroleum Transports, Inc.
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep’t, 158 F.3d 635, 643 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999); Wyland v. Boddie-Noell Enters., Inc., 165 F.3d 913 , 1998 WL 795173 , at *2 n. * (4th Cir.1998) (unpublished opinion).
cited
Cited "see"
Batac v. Pavarini Construction Co.
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep’t, 158 F.3d 635, 641 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999); Reeves, 140 F.3d at 151 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Magundayao
Corp. v. Robinson (In re Robinson), 293 B.R. 59, 64-65 (Bankr.D.Or.2002)(same); United States v. Trembath (In re Trembath), 205 B.R. 909, 914 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1997)(same); Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Daniels (In re Daniels), 163 B.R. 893, 897 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1994)(observing that expanding Cisneros’s use of Rule 60(b) to *179 vacate a chapter 13 discharge order would contravene the “fresh start” policy and the goal of finality); Ford v. Ford (In re Ford), 159 B.R. 590 (Bankr.D.Or.1993)(ruling that a court cannot revoke a chapter 7 discharge order under Rule 60(b), and reading “Cisneros…
discussed
Cited "see"
Duplessis v. Valenti (In Re Valenti)
See Branchburg Plaza Assocs., L.P. v. Fesq (In re Fesq), 153 F.3d 113 (3d Cir.1998) (§ 1330(a) precludes relief under Rule 60(b)), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999); Mason v. Young (In re Young), 237 B.R. 791, 800-03 (10th Cir. BAP 1999), aff'd on other grounds, 237 F.3d 1168 (10th Cir.2001); Educational Credit Mgmt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Baer, Inc. v. Schave
(2×)
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dept., 158 F.3d 635, 644 (2nd Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999)(10-20 pound lifting restriction); Gutridge v. Clure, 153 F.3d 898 , 901 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied sub nom, Gutridge v. Midland Computer, Inc., 526 U.S. 1113 , 119 S.Ct. 1758 , 143 L.Ed.2d 790 (1999)(20-45 pound lifting restriction); Snow v. Ridgeview Medical Center, 128 F.3d 1201, 1207 (8th Cir.1997)(25 pound lifting restriction); Thompson v. Holy Family Hospital, 121 F.3d 537, 540 (9th Cir.1997)(25-100 pound lifting restriction); Williams v. Ch…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pickard
See Webb v. ABF Freight System, Inc., 155 F.3d 1230, 1248 (10th Cir.1998) (“[N]o particular form of words is essential if the instruction as a whole conveys the correct statement of the applicable law.”), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999); Oertle v. United States, 370 F.2d 719, 726 (10th Cir.1966) (district court not required to give proposed jury instruction, even though substantively correct, if point of law it refers to is fairly and adequately covered by the instructions), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 943 , 87 S.Ct. 2075 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1329 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
See Webb v. ABF Freight Sys., Inc., 155 F.3d 1230, 1239 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Wellner v. Town of Westport
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep't 158 F.3d 635, 642-43 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Horwitz v. L & J.G. Stickley, Inc.
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep't, 158 F.3d 635, 642 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999); Francis v. Chemical Banking Corp., 62 F.Supp.2d 948, 963 (E.D.N.Y.1999); but see McAlindin v. County of San Diego, 192 F.3d 1226 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 2689 , 147 L.Ed.2d 961 (2000). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean Jackson
See Webb v. ABF Freight Sys., Inc., 155 F.3d 1230, 1249 (10th Cir.1998) (citing United States v. Reed, 147 F.3d 1178, 1180-81 (9th Cir.1998)), ce rt. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duncan, Jimmy L. v. WMATA
See 187 F.3d at 313. 47 Finally, the language taken by the majority from Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Department, 158 F.3d 635, 645 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 1253 (1999), is not inconsistent with a jury verdict in favor of Mr. Duncan.
cited
Cited "see"
Smoke v. Wal-Mart Stores
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep’t , 158 F.3d 635, 644 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 1253 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kiphart v. Saturn Corp.
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep't, 158 F.3d 635, 641 (2d Cir.1998) (holding that working on cars, doing yard work, painting, and driving long distances are not major life activities under the ADA), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Mescall v. Marra
See Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dep’t, 158 F.3d 635, 646 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999) (citing 29 C.F.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Cousins v. Howell Corp.
See generally Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dept., 158 F.3d 635, 642-43 (2d Cir.1998) (discussing the regulations), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill v. Pfizer, Inc.
Francis, 129 F.3d at 284 ; see also Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dept., 158 F.3d 635, 646 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Abrams
See, e.g., Branchburg Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Fesq (In re Fesq), 153 F.3d 113 (3d Cir.1998) (Shadur, J.), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999); United States v. Lee, 89 B.R. 250 (N.D.Ga.1987), aff'd, In re Hochman, 853 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir.1988) (affirming lower court decision that stated, without discussion or cites, and not as the main holding of the case, that confirmation orders could only be revoked for fraud pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1330 ); but see, Fesq, 153 F.3d at 120-24 (Stapleton, J., dissenting) (Rule 9024 does not limit the applicability of Fed.R.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lebron-Torres v. Whitehall Laboratories
See also Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dept., 158 F.3d 635, 642 (2d Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999) (activities listed in EEOC regulations are treated as major life activities per se, rather than as major life activities only to the extent that they are shown to affect a particular ADA plaintiff).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marilyn Anderson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. North Dakota State Hospital, Appellee/cross-Appellant
Compare Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 53 F.3d 723, 726 (5th Cir.1995) (factoring driving into a determination of whether a person cares for oneself), with Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Department, 158 F.3d 635, 643 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999) (holding that driving is not a major life activity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago Clemente v. Executive Airlines
See id. § 1630.2(i); see also Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Dept., 158 F.3d 635, 642 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1018 , 119 S.Ct. 1253 , 143 L.Ed.2d 350 (1999) (activities listed in EEOC regulations are treated as major life activities per Se, rather than as major life activities only to the extent that they are shown to affect a particular ADA plaintiff). 2 Where Santiago's claim encounters difficulty is at the third and final step of the analysis: her ear impairment was not shown to have substantially interfered with her performance of any of the identified major life activitie…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BRANCHBURG PLAZA ASSOCIATES, L.P.
v.
William FESQ
v.
William FESQ
No. 98-1174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1999.
Published
[*1254] Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.