Kontrick v. Ryan, 538 U.S. 998 (2003). · Go Syfert
Kontrick v. Ryan, 538 U.S. 998 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“defensive instruction is not required when the issue in question is not a statutorily-enumerated defense and merely serves to negate elements of the state's case”
67 citation events (65 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Burkett v. State (texapp, 2005-08-04) · Strongest negative: Alliance for Legal Action v. Federal Aviation Administration (ca4, 2003-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Alliance for Legal Action v. Federal Aviation Administration
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see City of Alameda v. FAA, 285 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1899 , 155 L.Ed.2d 842 (2003) (holding that a challenge to Part B determinations in an order involving both Part A and Part B must begin in district court).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Burkett v. State
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
defensive instruction is not required when the issue in question is not a statutorily-enumerated defense and merely serves to negate elements of the state's case
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Moore v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
Because the requested instructions served only to negate the public servant element of the retaliation charge, the trial court was not required to submit them. "[A] defensive instruction is not required when the issue in question is not a statutorily-enumerated defense and merely serves to negate elements of the State's case." Ortiz v. State, 93 S.W.3d 79, 92 (Tex.Crim.App.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 998 , 123 S.Ct. 1901 , 155 L.Ed.2d 824 *316 (2003).
cited Cited "see" State of Tennessee v. Julio Cesar Hernandez Salinas
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Austin, 87 S.W.3d 447, 471 (Tenn. 2002) (citing State v. Stephenson, 878 S.W.2d 530, 540 (Tenn. 1994)), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S. Ct. 1899 , 155 L.
cited Cited "see" State of Tennessee v. Barry Wayne Dunham
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Austin, 87 S.W.3d 447, 471 (Tenn. 2002) (citing State v. Stephenson, 878 S.W.2d 530, 540 (Tenn. 1994)), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S. Ct. 1899 , 155 L.
cited Cited "see" State of Tennessee v. George Ratliff
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Austin, 87 S.W.3d 447, 471 (Tenn. 2002) (citing State v. Stephenson, 878 S.W.2d 530, 540 (Tenn. 1994)), -14- cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S. Ct. 1899 , 155 L.
cited Cited "see" State of Tennessee v. Andrew Thomas and Anthony Bond
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Austin, 87 S.W.3d 447, 472-73 (Tenn. 2002), cert. den. 71 USLW 3679 , 123 S.Ct. 1899 (2003), (citing Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S. Ct. 844, 852 (1985)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Deaver v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954, 956-57 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (affirming the appellant’s conviction when the facts surrounding the search were not sufficiently developed) (citing Jackson v. State, 877 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.Crim.App.1994)); see also Ortiz v. State, 93 S.W.3d 79, 93 (Tex.Crim.App.2002), ce rt. denied, 538 U.S. 998 , 123 S.Ct. 1901 , 155 L.Ed.2d 824 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quattrocchi v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Giesberg v. State, the court of criminal appeals determined that defenses that have been created by the legislature that tend either to totally exonerate a defendant or to excuse or justify a defendant's conduct so that he is absolved of culpability, *123 such as those identified in chapters eight (General Defenses to Criminal Responsibility) and Nine (Justifications for Criminal Conduct) of the penal code, require a special instruction. 984 S.W.2d 245, 248-50 (Tex.Crim.App.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1147 , 119 S.Ct. 1044 , 143 L.Ed.2d 51 (1999); see also Ortiz v. State, 93 S.W.3d 79, 92…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Tennessee v. Detrick Cole
Tenn. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Austin, 87 S.W.3d 447 app. at 487 (Tenn.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 1899 , 155 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); Vann, 976 S.W.2d at 117 ; State v. Keen, 926 S.W.2d 727, 742 (Tenn.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Andrew J. KONTRICK
v.
Robert A. RYAN
No. 02-819.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Apr 28, 2003.
538 U.S. 998

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.